SEARCH THIS BLOG

Showing posts with label Panchayati Raj. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Panchayati Raj. Show all posts

Thursday, March 10, 2011

271 - NREGA 'breaking the feudally enforced silence' - One World South Asia


09 July 2009

The flagship programme of the Congress-led alliance in India for rural employment helped the incumbent government come to power for another term, say social activists Aruna Roy and Nikhil Dey. With an increase of 144% budgetary allocation for the NREGS, the government has shown a strong commitment for inclusive growth.

Suddenly the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) has become a buzzword. It stands vindicated by the mandate of the people in its most basic evaluation in a democracy – the general elections. Basking in the glory and security of post-electoral analysis, it is actually the best time for those who support the basic philosophy of the NREGA to focus on what it has done and what it has not, by its own parameters.

An opportunity for rural renewal, an NREGA project
site in Rajasthan/ Photo credit: The Hindu
An opportunity for rural renewal, an NREGA project site in Rajasthan/ Photo credit: The Hindu
The first and the primary focus should be to examine its impact on the human resource base of rural India. Has it energised, mobilised, empowered, and delivered to India’s poorest and most marginalised rural people?

Secondly, has it provided those who were “not shining” a measure of dignity, tangible economic benefit, and a motivation to participate in local action? This is the crux, for, something as vast and ambitious as the NREGA can only succeed in bringing about change if millions of workers become its true advocates and monitors.

Let us begin with the most persistent charges of endemic corruption. Notwithstanding negative propaganda and the prominent reportage of corruption, NREGA stands apart from employment and poverty alleviation programmes in significant ways.

It is the first national programme of consequence which has woven transparency and accountability into the mundane fabric of daily interaction of people with government.

"It is the first national programme of consequence which has woven transparency and accountability into the mundane fabric of daily interaction of people with government"
The cases of reported corruption have shocked the intelligentsia. The rural worker might often be the victim but will still offer critical support, not only because it has provided wage income, but also for facilitating disclosure, which helps identify and fight pilferage. In fact, in many cases, scams have been exposed by the workers themselves.

NREGA gives an opportunity to break the feudally enforced silence of its victims. Through transparency and social audit measures, it allows anyone, anywhere to be part of the monitoring of the delivery system. The other programmes appear to be clean only because no one knows what goes on!

The NREGA gives a further opportunity to realise the Constitutional sovereignty, the power of the people. What the political establishment would do well to understand is that the vote was not a blind endorsement, but the expression of a fragile hope of a rational participatory relationship with the government.

New claims

The NREGA has opened up a unique legal space for the poor, with a consequent, legally-mandated obligation on the administration to deliver. In fact, implementation rests on the simple philosophy that ordinary people will go to great lengths to procure their entitlements, given the space to do so.

Apart from systemic corruption, we are all aware of the chronic inefficiency, unwillingness and incapacities of the bureaucratic system to deliver entitlements for the poor. The persistent argument was that in this context implementation would be impossible.

The NREGA sought to create real opportunities and legal spaces, with the belief that people will begin to push to overcome bureaucratic and political resistance. The electoral endorsement over, it is a good time to begin to examine this aspect of bottom-up implementation. Does the rights-based approach really work?

The Act has a number of “trigger mechanisms” designed to activate and establish people’s entitlements. One such trigger is the right to have a Job Card. The Act mandates that anyone who applies at their Panchayat for a Job Card must be given one within 15 days.

"The Act has a number of “trigger mechanisms” designed to activate and establish people’s entitlements. One such trigger is the right to have a Job Card"
Without a Job Card, people cannot even apply for work, nor corroborate the records. It is a “license” and “pan card” of the wage worker’s family, with a record of days of work and wages received during the year. There are many States where large numbers of people have demanded, but not received, Job Cards.

In many Panchayats, the Job Cards are in the control of implementing agencies. Publicising the Job Card as a record of individual entitlements, to be updated by the authorities, and kept in possession of the workers, would ensure the NREGA is monitored by its workers.

Crucial accountability

The application for work and the dated receipt are crucial to trigger the demand for work. The receipt is also the basic record for claiming unemployment allowance if the work is not provided within 15 days.

States like Rajasthan have fared well in providing Job Cards, and providing work within 15 days, but resistance to giving dated receipts has become a massive problem. No State has effectively activated this important mechanism. Nevertheless, it has worked when workers groups have got organised.

In the 30 years of existence of its precursor, the Maharashtra Employment Guarantee Act, there is no recorded instance of payment of unemployment allowance. The NREGA has already recorded payment of unemployment allowance to large numbers of workers in chronically poorly-administered areas.

The successful people’s struggles for the payment of unemployment allowance – in Barwani District of Madhya Pradesh, Raichur of Karnataka, Bolangir, Navrangpur and Kalahandi of Orissa, Latehar in Jharkhand, Sitapur District of UP – has been a breakthrough in accountability, and an inspiration to other workers struggling for entitlements.

The payment of unemployment allowance emanates from an administrative lapse, and is eventually deducted from the pocket of erring officials. It is not a freebie doled out of the government exchequer. Like the Right to Information Act, this has created an important mechanism for enforcing the right while holding the bureaucracy accountable.

The wage under NREGA has been another trigger and indicator of its success. The wage rate, the measurement system, and the timely payment of wages have all become part of the entitlement package. Thanks to NREGA, minimum wages have, for the first time, become a real factor in determining the lower limit for market wages. There are many ongoing struggles for the payment of minimum wages; and adopting a transparent measurement system for every work-site is a management challenge that has thrown up many grassroots solutions.

Bottlenecks

Wage payments through NREGA have initiated the biggest “financial inclusion” drive, with the requirement that all wage payments be made through banks and post offices. The engineers, the accountants, and the post offices have been unable to cope, and late payments have begun to cripple the Act.

Students and Academics, working together with workers’ organisations in Khunti District in Jharkhand, have operationalised the entitlement in the NREGA to get Rs 2,000/- per worker paid to over 300 workers as compensation for delayed payment under the provisions of the Payment of Wages Act.

The Khunti payment, made last month, has once again demonstrated that the solution to the vexatious issue of late payments lies in the entitlement framework.

The uneven implementation in different States has shown that where people’s struggles have gained political and administrative respect, the NREGA has shown tangible results on a massive scale. It is that battleground of struggle that could well determine the future of the political discourse in this country.

"The uneven implementation in different States has shown that where people’s struggles have gained political and administrative respect, the NREGA has shown tangible results on a massive scale"
The Government of India has transferred adequate money to the States and Districts to make timely wage payments. C.P. Joshi, the current Union Minister for Rural Development and Panchayati Raj, was reported to have talked about his party prospects in the polls being negatively affected because of late wage payments in Rajasthan.

As Union Minister now, if he were to exercise his administrative and political will to ensure compensation is paid to those receiving delayed wage payments, the lethargic bureaucratic system will find a way to respond. Chronic delays in wage payments during the drought in Rajasthan became a political issue, and the delays were wiped out. Innovations and mechanisms respond to a bottom-up demand, but do so best when the political establishment puts pressure.

The NREGA also assures an adequate, realistic provision for administrative expenses. At the current six per cent of total costs which has been allowed for administrative costs, there is no legitimacy in citing a shortage of staff or resources for bureaucratic delay.

In Rajasthan, for instance, the over 7,000 crores spent on NREGA last year amounts to a massive Rs 450 crores available for administrative expenses per year. This kind of money and resources can, in fact, help gram Panchayats become properly resourced to better carry out their overall responsibilities. It can also help ensure that there is no excuse for the failure to carry out all transparency measures and put an effective grievance redressal mechanism in place.

Biggest contribution

Transparency and accountability to the poorest and the weakest is in fact the biggest potential contribution of the NREGA to the entire governance system. The NREGA is an outstanding example of how the RTI Act can be woven into the fabric of the delivery system and the whole legal and governance paradigm. The entire expenditure on works and workers – 94% of the total amount – is required to be put on the website of the NREGA, with every transaction revealed in detail.

This can easily be increased to 100 per cent. Using this Management Information System (MIS), Vijaypura Gram Panchayat in Rajsamand District has begun to build a Janata Information System (JIS) painted on the walls of government buildings in the Gram Panchayat.

The boards reveal the details of the number of days of work provided and payments made in the year to every Job Card holder in the Panchayat. Also painted on the walls are the list of works sanctioned, the expenditure on labour and material, and item-wise expenditure on material in each work in the Panchayat, including exactly how many bags of cement, sand and trolleys of stone were procured, and at what rate in the Gram Panchayat. This is like a web wall which reveals to every interested visitor all that they want to examine.

What can be done in one Panchayat can be carried out in the 9,189 Panchayats of Rajasthan, and the hundreds of thousands of Panchayats in India. The walls in Vijaypura Panchayat provide details of 976 families given employment in 2008-09, where two thirds have completed 100 days, with an expenditure of 91 lakhs.

The Sarpanch is a Dalit youth from a poor family, elected in a general seat, and the Panchayat is proof of how well an Employment Guarantee programme can be implemented, in terms of people’s entitlements, transparency measures, worksite management, and many other innovations.

Larger impact

If the millions of financial transactions of the NREGA can go on their web site, there can be no justification for not following the example and putting almost every financial transaction of government – receipt or expenditure – on the web sites of the relevant department or agency. Proactive disclosure is a requirement of the RTI Act, and is a good example of the larger potential impact of the NREGA on governance.

The NREGA is India’s first law to codify development rights in a legal framework, and like the RTI, it has begun to set an example in a global context.

"The NREGA is India’s first law to codify development rights in a legal framework, and like the RTI, it has begun to set an example in a global context"
Apart from the law, and a set of guidelines, there is a strong and immediate need to formulate rules to operationalise provisions in the Act; which includes guaranteeing grievance redressal in seven days, social audit twice a year, and mandatory transparency and proactive disclosure.

Properly incorporated and enforced, a comprehensive set of operational rules could strengthen the entitlement framework, fixing responsibility at every level.

Once again, it would enable bottom-up pressure for implementation, which should be matched by a strong political mandate. Today, the NREGA has millions of workers’ unresolved and un-addressed grievances and problems to be dealt with.

A response system could not only radically improve the NREGA, but can impact and transform the whole face of rural governance.

Is the NREGA an administrator’s nightmare or a redistribution of income and power? A social safety net or a step towards the right to work, to prevent migration, and even boost local market economies? For those who cannot think beyond the pale of the free market economy and the business model manager, it is indeed a nightmare.

For years, simplistic management solutions to poverty, with the poor as an input to be managed, have failed. We cannot see ordinary people as active participants and empowered citizens.

That is why there is difficulty in understanding the practice and logic of democracy and difficult, therefore, to understand the realistic detailing and complexity of an Employment Guarantee initiative.

Inclusive growth

Independent India has to acknowledge the critical role the NREGA has played in providing a measure of inclusive growth. It has given people a right to work, to re-establish the dignity of labour, to ensure people’s economic and democratic rights and entitlements, to create labour intensive infrastructure and assets, and to build the human resource base of our country.

For the first time, the power elite recognises the people’s right to fight endemic hunger and poverty with dignity, accepting that their labour will be the foundation for infrastructure and economic growth.

"For the first time, the power elite recognises the people’s right to fight endemic hunger and poverty with dignity, accepting that their labour will be the foundation for infrastructure and economic growth"
The entitlements paradigm is still to be established in many States in the country.

Second generation issues like the expansion of the categories of permissible works needs to be taken up with labour and the deprived continuing to be the central focus.

The improvements must be to strengthen, not divert from these basic tenets. In the midst of the current economic slowdown, there is enough evidence that this kind of commitment can work to help reduce the slowdown.

The political class would do well to understand that the most important solution is an assertion of its will to respond to people’s voices. The many wise, creative, and innovative initiatives emerging from theory and practice have a future only if they are owned by the people and implemented with justice.

The NREGA can give people an opportunity to make the entire system truly transparent and accountable. Properly supported, people’s struggles for basic entitlements can, in turn, become the strongest political initiative to strengthen our democratic fabric.

Aruna Roy and Nikhil Dey are activists with the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS). Email: arunaroy@gmail.com, nikhildey@gmail.com.

Source : The Hindu

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

268 - Activists to send low wage feat' to Guinness - The Times of India

Activists to send low wage feat' to Guinness
TNN, Oct 7, 2010, 12.35am IST
JAIPUR: In a bitter reaction to payment of low wages of Re 1 under MNREGA in Rajasthan, the agitating activists of Suchna Evum Rozgar Ka Adhikar Abhiyan have decided to send this rare "feat" of the government to the " Guinness Book of World Record" as the only of its kind trend in the world. There have been instances in Rajasthan when Re 1 per day was paid as wages for work done for about a fortnight under the MNREGA.

"Paying wages as low as Re 1 must be the most unique episode of paying pittance. I doubt if there are any precedence of this kind in the world. If Guinness takes note of our application, probably it will wake up the state government," said Nikhil Dey, one of the leading activists involved with the ongoing campaign seeking increase in MNREGA wages.

About 99 people in Gudaliya village in Tonk district had toiled hard for 11 days to dig a check-dam under the rural employment guarantee scheme. But when it came to wages, they were paid only Rs 11. That is Re 1 for each day's labour. So irked were the workers that they on the first day of their agitation on Saturday deposited the money to the chief minister's relief fund. "Only someone who is more poor than us will need this money," they said. However, officials have been maintaining that the workers were paid Re 1 as they had not done any work at all.

But that is just one amongst the big agenda that the Abhiyan unfolded on Wednesday to be carried out during their indefinite dharna here near Statue Circle. The sit-in is in protest of anomalies surrounding NREGA in the state and in demand for a more transparent system.

The Abhiyan will be holding discussions on Section 4 of the RTI on October 9 while the next day there will be discussions on whether NREGA has managed to reach the disabled people. On October 15, a session would be held on rights of labourers under NREGA while October 25 will be discussions on NREGA and empowerment of panchayats. On October 30, the labourers pay commission that has been formed and that includes people like Jean Dreze will give its verdict as to what the minimum wages in the state should be.

The Abhiyan will be filing applications under the RTI on September 7 to the district collectors of the 33 districts here demanding an enquiry into the purchases made at the district level under NREGA.

On Wednesday the sit-in got bigger with villagers from Khaiwara, Kotra, Jhadole from Udaipur district, Relmangra in Rajsamand district and others from Baran and Nagaur joining in the agitation.

At the sit in stories of under payment unfolded with one Karan Singh of Untwalia village in Nagaur narrating on how he toiled for building a gravelled road between Untwalia and Saranpura between September 16 to 30 but was paid just Rs 150 when the muster rolls showed his payment as Rs 360. "I wrote to one and all concerned regarding the anomaly but my pleas went unheard," he said.

Another NREGA mate Jankilal Sahriya informed that even after 15 days the payments were not made at the Hatri village in Baran though under the Act it is mandatory that payments are to be made within a fortnight. "We enquired with various officials but all were at a loss," he said.

The sit-in is expected to gather momentum in the coming days with people from many more villages expected to join in.

Sunday, March 6, 2011

214 - Asides - India Law and technology Blog

ASIDES

BY SAPTAK SANYAL ⋅ SEPTEMBER 19, 2010 ⋅ POST A COMMENT
Mr Manishankar Aiyar one of the most outspoken and proactive legislator who is always in forefront in any public debate on various general issues affecting the common man, be it CWG or any other scams, has called into question the very relevance of having Aadhaar when we are already bearing the burdens of all other cards for according to Mr Aiyar the problem lies with the method of allocation and not in identification for availing the benefits under a particular scheme. Due to lack of governance in rural India the implementation part of this initiative might face new hurdles and without involving State Govt in this project, Project Adhaar might not be able to serve the purpose for which it began. He has compared this project with famous dream initiative of Rajeev Gandhi to reform Panchayti Raj which remained ineffective till date due to lack of cooperation from State Governments to enrich governance at the grass root level. It is true that technology plays crucial role in transforming societies but to sustain such transformations political establishment has a role to play and it cannot be ignored. For more read here

199 - anchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) to Play Active Role in the Implementation of UID (Aadhaar Programme)- PIB

Ministry of Panchayati Raj and Unique Identification Authority of India have agreed that the Panchayati Raj Institutions as the units of local self governments will be active partners in the UID Programme.

Inability to prove identity is one of the major barriers that prevents the poor from accessing the benefits and subsidies available under various developmental and welfare programmes. Better delivery of services through better access and inclusion of the poor, marginalised and the underprivileged is a major objective of the UID programme.

Panchayats have a role in both planning and implementing some of the major programmes. There are a total of 28,18,290 elected representatives of Panchayats at all three levels in 23 States and 6 Union Territories of which 10,39,058 are women. This large number of natural grass roots leaders is best placed to generate awareness about the UID Programme and ensure that the process of enrolment is inclusive. They can act as influencers, be introducers for people without documents and enrollers too, if they so choose. Gram Sabhas provide the forum for awareness generation as well as platform for ensuring inclusion.

The Ministry of Panchayati Raj and Unique Identification Authority of India have agreed to work together in ensuring organic linkages of PRIs in the UID Mission on a continuing basis not only for enrolments at the initial stage but also for authentication and subsequent applications in providing better and accountable local governance.

DS/GK

194 - UID Project: Identity Crisis - India Today

September 3, 2010

He was Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's choice to number India's teeming millions. Nandan Nilekani was the rock star of corporate India delivered to Yojana Bhavan as if by FedEx to head the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI). The UPA Government had taken inspiration from Nilekani's own thinking-which he espoused in his book Imagining India: Ideas for the New Century-on the need for a unique identity number for citizens. Nilekani quit his much-respected job as co-chairperson of Infosys last year to take up the new assignment with a sense of duty for the larger cause.

But as he moves beyond the rhetoric of Imagining India to the task of Imaging India, the UID project is coming under the scanner for its utility in a country that has already become a house of identity cards. Though the authority is all set to roll out the process this month, the UID's ability to give a massive jolt to the flawed public delivery system based on identity numbers is being questioned. Many social activists, thinkers and even leaders like the Congress's Mani Shankar Aiyar are wondering whether the project is worthwhile.

The UID will assign a unique number (Aadhaar number) to each enrolled individual. Various registering agencies like banks or insurance companies will be appointed to identify the person in case of his dealings with a public organisation, regulatory authority or law enforcement agency. The information on the UID database will be basic-name, date of birth, place of birth, gender, the name and UID numbers of both parents, address, and photograph and fingerprints.

"UID is an important part of public service delivery reforms. Its benefits will be far greater than its cost."
Nandan Nilekani, UIDAI chairman
Unlike the pan card or the voter's id card, the UID number will not ensure any benefits or rights. It will only help in identifying the person while opening bank accounts or enrolling for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) jobs. The Government has approved a budget of Rs 3,170 crore for the first two phases spread over five years. It is selling the new UID number as a system that will uniquely identify each person and enable it to target and deliver services effectively, especially in the Public Distribution System (PDS). With a network of over four lakh fair price shops selling commodities worth more than Rs 15,000 crore to about 16 crore families every year, the PDS is one of the largest distribution networks of its kind in the world.
One of the key challenges most Indians face is the difficulty in establishing their identity. The UID claims to end the menace of having to hold more than one ID card to access entitled benefits. According to the UIDAI, "The singular problem that it will seek to solve is of 'identity'. Once a person has a UID number, their basic identity, linked to their biometrics, is established and can be used to uniquely identify the individual."

But many think that the scheme is a step behind social realities that reduce the access of needy sections to welfare schemes in spite of a series of identity cards. Questions are being asked about introducing a new number-based identity when several identity proofs already exist. "The Aadhaar number will not do away with all the other cards. Over time, it will be the unifying number across various cards. It will enable online authentication of identity and will be a proof of identity, especially for those sections of society that have no such form now," says Nilekani.

This article appeared in the India Today magazine dated August 23, 2010. Subscribe to the print copy or read it on Zinio and Kindle.

The recurring problem with the PDS is not that above poverty line families creep into the system but that many worthy BPL families are out of the ambit of the scheme. A 2005 Planning Commission study found that about 58 per cent of subsidised foodgrain does not reach BPL families. The UID in no way guarantees benefits and the new law doesn't prevent various service providers from seeking other background documents even if an applicant has a valid UID number.

"Hi-tech without Panchayati Raj is just a bogus stunt for geeks and nerds." Mani Shankar Aiyar, Congress leader
Thus, it is no guarantee for an immigrant worker from Bihar to get a ration card in Delhi. In effect, the number may add to the existing set of worries. Nilekani agrees that it is still the responsibility of the state governments to determine the eligibility for benefits. But he insists that the Aadhaar number will facilitate the process. Others argue that the UID is a wrong solution for a bigger problem.
 
"The problem with our social investments is not duplication of cards but exclusion of a large number of citizens. Instead of pouring money to remove duplication, which is only a minor part of the problem, the Government needs to expand the schemes to include more needy people," says R. Ramkumar of the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai.

When the Planning Commission first decided on the scheme, it was not about numbers being assigned to people but smart cards, much like a multi-storied building where each scheme is "housed" in one floor. Now the idea of the card has been abandoned and the UIDAI's purview will be limited to issuing unique identification numbers. If you are asking for a job under the MGNREGS, the authorities will send your number to the UIDAI centralised office and a message will be sent saying yes or no. This will verify whether you are the person you are claiming to be.

UID for Dummies

Five-year plan: Over five years from this year-end, the authority plans to issue 600 million UIDs through various "registrar" agencies across the country, which include both Government and private sector agencies like insurance companies and banks.

Database: A resident will have to go to an enrolling agency, fill up a form and provide the supporting documentation, including a photograph, all 10 fingerprints and iris scan. The enrolling agency will collect this data that will be passed on to the UID database.

Reaching the masses: If the individual is not already in the database, a UID number will be issued and sent to him at his home by speedpost. The tear-away portion in the letter can act as a card to reference the number.

Not proof enough: The UID number will not be proof of citizenship. It will include all residents who are in India and want to use public services.

Single window: It has been marketed as the single source of identity verification. People would be spared the trouble of repeatedly providing identity documents. They need to give their number as residence proof, which will be verified with the centralised data. 


A FULL DECK
India has already become a house of ID cards
CARD :                                                              COVERAGE
PAN Card:                                                    Every person with taxable income
Election Photo Identity Card:                   Indian citizens above 18
Employee Provident Fund Org:               Employees in the formal sector
Multi-Purpose National Identity Card : Citizens of India. Is issued by the Central Govt.
Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana Card : Provides insurance cover to all BPL families
MGNREGS card :                                        Citizens of India seeking employment under the        scheme
Driving Licence :                                         Citizens who are 18 and above
Passport:                                                      Citizens of India who travel abroad
Ration Card :                                               Cards issued to those families who use the PDS system. Only BPL families qualify.

 UID will not remove the pitfalls of the PDS. The exclusion that denies people access to food cannot be corrected by electronic identity. In fact, it will deepen the exclusion and criminalise the excluded," says social activist Vandana Shiva. The UID also cannot address two major sources of leakage in the PDS and MGNREGS. First, the diversion of grains and pulses happen on the way to the ration shops. Second, the dealers only sell part of the entitled food to the poor and testify on official documents that they have got their full quota.
0
"The innocuous application of UID to social policy does not diminish the danger of state control."
Jean Dreze, Economist 

Foreign Hands

Privacy concerns have made ID cards a non-starter in many countries

European Countries
Most European Union members have voluntary and compulsory ID cards, except Denmark, Latvia and Lithuania. In Sweden, information is stored on a chip in the card and not in any central database.

United Kingdom
The government's attempts to impose compulsory ID cards sparked off fury early this year. The Home Affairs committee shot down the idea as its benefits outweighed the increased data protection risks.

United States
The Social Security programme number is also used as the national identification number. But attempts at introducing biometric national cards have come under fire from rights groups.

China
Early this year, China began issuing smart cards to its citizens. The cards can also help identify those who use ATMs, enter a building with an electronic guard system or even pick up their children from kindergarten.

Australia
In 1985, the government proposed Australian cards, mostly to curb tax evasion. Following a vigorous opposition campaign, the proposal was withdrawn in 1987. 

Tech Troubles

UID faces the biggest challenge from its focus, the rural poor

Identity parade: Nilekani will bank on unique patterns on our fingers to identify 1.14 billion people. While two metrics will be used in issuing the UID number-an iris scan and a photograph-fingerprinting will be the metric used in authentication.

Quality check: Worn-out fingers of farmers and manual labourers have made the task tough for UID technicians. These fingers, euphemistically referred to in technical literature as "low-quality" fingerprints, exist precisely in the demographic segment the UID aims to help.

Blind reality: An iris scan can't be done on people with corneal blindness or corneal scars. The number of people with corneal blindness alone is estimated at six to eight million. Only a photograph can be used for identity determination until competent technology is developed.

No minor issue: Children's fingerprints, iris scans and photographs will be updated every five years till the age of 18. Till then, either of the parents will need to provide their biometric information for authentication.

This article appeared in the India Today magazine dated August 23, 2010. Subscribe to the print copy or read it on Zinio and Kindle.