SEARCH THIS BLOG

Showing posts with label Privacy International. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Privacy International. Show all posts

Sunday, March 6, 2011

209 - Keeping tabs around the world

Keeping tabs around the world

• Compulsory national identity cards are used in about 100 countries including Germany, France, Belgium, Greece, Luxembourg, Portugal and Spain

• ID cards are not used in the US, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, the Irish Republic or Nordic countries

• German police can detain people who are not carrying their ID card for up to 24 hours

• The Bush Administration resisted calls for an identity card in the US after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001

• In Australia street protests in the 1980s forced the Government to abandon its plans for a card

• Plastic cards are favoured over paper documents because they are harder to forge

• Most identity cards contain the name, sex, date of birth and a unique number for the holder

• South Korean, Brazilian, Italian and Malaysian ID cards contain fingerprints. Cards in some countries contain information on any distinguishing marks of the holder

• Objections to card schemes have focused on the cost and invasion of privacy

• Supporters say that they prevent illegal immigration and fraud

• In the European Union some cards can be used instead of a passport for European travel

Sources: Privacy International; Times database

177 - The Eternal Value of Privacy - Bruce Schneier

The Eternal Value of Privacy
Bruce Schneier   05.18.06

The most common retort against privacy advocates -- by those in favor of ID checks, cameras, databases, data mining and other wholesale surveillance measures -- is this line: "If you aren't doing anything wrong, what do you have to hide?"

Some clever answers: "If I'm not doing anything wrong, then you have no cause to watch me." "Because the government gets to define what's wrong, and they keep changing the definition." "Because you might do something wrong with my information." My problem with quips like these -- as right as they are -- is that they accept the premise that privacy is about hiding a wrong. It's not. Privacy is an inherent human right, and a requirement for maintaining the human condition with dignity and respect.

Two proverbs say it best: Quis custodiet custodes ipsos? ("Who watches the watchers?") and "Absolute power corrupts absolutely."

Cardinal Richelieu understood the value of surveillance when he famously said, "If one would give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest man, I would find something in them to have him hanged." Watch someone long enough, and you'll find something to arrest -- or just blackmail -- with. Privacy is important because without it, surveillance information will be abused: to peep, to sell to marketers and to spy on political enemies -- whoever they happen to be at the time.

Privacy protects us from abuses by those in power, even if we're doing nothing wrong at the time of surveillance.

We do nothing wrong when we make love or go to the bathroom. We are not deliberately hiding anything when we seek out private places for reflection or conversation. We keep private journals, sing in the privacy of the shower, and write letters to secret lovers and then burn them. Privacy is a basic human need.

A future in which privacy would face constant assault was so alien to the framers of the Constitution that it never occurred to them to call out privacy as an explicit right. Privacy was inherent to the nobility of their being and their cause. Of course being watched in your own home was unreasonable. Watching at all was an act so unseemly as to be inconceivable among gentlemen in their day. You watched convicted criminals, not free citizens. You ruled your own home. It's intrinsic to the concept of liberty.

For if we are observed in all matters, we are constantly under threat of correction, judgment, criticism, even plagiarism of our own uniqueness. We become children, fettered under watchful eyes, constantly fearful that -- either now or in the uncertain future -- patterns we leave behind will be brought back to implicate us, by whatever authority has now become focused upon our once-private and innocent acts. We lose our individuality, because everything we do is observable and recordable.

How many of us have paused during conversation in the past four-and-a-half years, suddenly aware that we might be eavesdropped on? Probably it was a phone conversation, although maybe it was an e-mail or instant-message exchange or a conversation in a public place. Maybe the topic was terrorism, or politics, or Islam. We stop suddenly, momentarily afraid that our words might be taken out of context, then we laugh at our paranoia and go on. But our demeanor has changed, and our words are subtly altered.

This is the loss of freedom we face when our privacy is taken from us. This is life in former East Germany, or life in Saddam Hussein's Iraq. And it's our future as we allow an ever-intrusive eye into our personal, private lives.

Too many wrongly characterize the debate as "security versus privacy." The real choice is liberty versus control. Tyranny, whether it arises under threat of foreign physical attack or under constant domestic authoritative scrutiny, is still tyranny. Liberty requires security without intrusion, security plus privacy. Widespread police surveillance is the very definition of a police state. And that's why we should champion privacy even when we have nothing to hide.
- - -
Bruce Schneier is the CTO of Counterpane Internet Security and the author of Beyond Fear: Thinking Sensibly About Security in an Uncertain World. You can contact him through his website.

Read More http://www.wired.com/politics/security/commentary/securitymatters/2006/05/70886#ixzz0xPAd7B8n

Thursday, March 3, 2011

81 - Privacy International

Privacy International

About Privacy International:

Privacy International (PI) is a human rights group formed in 1990 as a watchdog on surveillance and privacy invasions by governments and corporations. PI is based in London, England, and has an office in Washington, D.C. We have campaigned across the world to protect people against intrusion by governments and corporations that seek to erode this fragile right. We believe that privacy forms part of the bedrock of freedoms, and our goal has always been to use every means to preserve it. For more information please click here. To donate to PI please click here. Follow us on Twitter or join our Facebook group.

About Privacy International

16/12/2009

For nearly twenty years Privacy International (PI) has vigorously defended personal privacy. We have campaigned across the world to protect people against intrusion by governments and corporations that seek to erode this fragile right. We believe that privacy forms part of the bedrock of freedoms, and our goal has always been to use every means to preserve it. Our campaigns are often controversial, but they always respect the primacy of truth and principle.

PI is the oldest surviving privacy advocacy group in the world, and was the first organisation to campaign at an international level on privacy issues. Its antecedents stretch back to 1987, at which time the organisation’s founders started to build an international network in response to mounting concern across the world over the changing nature and magnitude of privacy violations.

Background

In 1990, in response to a growing number of privacy threats, more than a hundred leading privacy experts and Human Rights organizations from forty countries linked arms to form a world organization for the protection of privacy. Members of the new body, including computer professionals, academics, lawyers, journalists, jurists and human rights activists, had a common interest in promoting an international understanding of the importance of privacy and data protection. Meetings of the group, which took the name Privacy International, were held throughout that year in North America, Europe, Asia and the South Pacific, and members agreed to work toward the establishment of effective privacy protection throughout the world.

The formation of Privacy International is the first successful attempt to establish a structured world focus on this crucial area of human rights.

Administration and Organisation

In the nineteen years since its first meeting in Luxembourg in 1990, PI has adopted a broad brief. We have organised more than 100 conferences and award ceremonies, participated in hundreds of national and international meetings, participated in an estimated 20,000 media interviews, organised campaigns, produced publications.

We are frequently called upon to give expert testimony to parliamentary and government committees, including those of the Australian, Canadian, South African, and United Kingdom Parliaments. We are the secretariat to the UK Parliament's All-Party Group on Privacy. We have also advised and reported to international and inter-governmental organisations including the Council of Europe, the European Parliament, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, and the United Nations (e.g. ECOSOC, UNDP, UNESCO, UNHCR, World Bank). PI now has active associates and networks in 40 countries.

PI is registered in the UK as a non-profit private limited company (no. 4354366).

Privacy International is a non-government organization with the primary role of advocacy and support. We have an international advisory board with members from 40 countries, and a board of trustees who oversee our staff.

Campaigns, Networking, and Research

According to our Memorandum of Association, PI's objectives are:

To raise awareness of and to provide education about threats to personal privacy;
To work at a national and international level toward the provision of strong and effective privacy law;
To monitor the nature, effectiveness and extent of measures to protect privacy and personal data;
To conduct research into threats to personal privacy;
To monitor and report on surveillance activities of security forces and intelligence agencies;
To scrutinise the nature, extent and implications of transborder flows of information;
To engage in advocacy at a national and international level such as making representations to bodies such as the United Nations, the Council of Europe and the OECD;
To seek ways through which information technology can be used in the protection of privacy.
PI deals at any one time with dozens of key issues. This year, our campaigns, media activity and projects encompassed continuing our work in promoting privacy safeguards in developing countries, working closely with free expression groups on the importance of protecting both privacy and free speech, monitoring and reporting on anti-terrorism policy developments in collaboration with the international community, and working with the private sector and government to promote and advance privacy protections.

We remain engaged with a variety of other issues on a regular basis, including identity and biometric systems, corporate governance, cross-border data flows, data retention by companies and governments, information security, national security, cybercrime and aspects of around a hundred technologies and technology applications ranging from video surveillance to DNA profiling. Our strategies of engagement included participating in judicial processes, and government consultations, filing legal complaints, research and report writing, running events and campaigns, and media awareness exercises.

PI is a chameleon-like group. It can in the same moment be described as troublemaker and think-tank, campaigner and researcher. Its staff and members embrace deeply held concerns about privacy, and they believe that the organisation should not be confined to a narrow mission and standard operating procedures. We see no problem in launching controversial and polemic wildcat campaigns while at the same time engaging in some of the field’s most elaborate and highly acclaimed research.

PI’s political profile has always confounded supporters and critics alike. To those on the left side of the political spectrum, we are considered 'libertarian'. Meanwhile conservatives and libertarians have described us as 'socialists'. The truth is that PI has always believed that privacy is apolitical by nature. This position is reflected in the composition of our Trustees and Board of advisors: on the traditional 'right', our members include Ayn Rand enthusiast Professor Ian Angell and politicians such as U.S. Presidential Candidate Bob Barr who ran on behalf of the Libertarian Party, and the Earl of Northesk who is a member of the House of Lords representing the Conservative Party; and on the 'liberal' or 'left' side of the political spectrum, our advisory board and trustees include world-renowned politicians, jurists and consumer advocates, including Professor Noam Chomsky, Sophie In't Veld who is a Member of the European Parliament for the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats (ALDE) Party, and numerous representatives from the Association for Progressive Communications. It is a pleasure to work with people from across the spectrum. We are also delighted to be respected or reviled in equal measure by all sides of politics.

Similarly, our public profile confounds many. We have been covered in nearly every major publication around the world (Click here for a small sample of our media coverage from 1996 to 2005 and click here to see some of our press releases.). We receive hundreds of emails and voicemails a week from the media and the public. Sometimes the public is seeking advice on corporate or government surveillance, other times they want to express their opinions regarding our campaigns. Their opinions range from outright support to utter contempt.

The variety of messages and media coverage that follows goes to show that people around the world are participating in debates about privacy. We believe that our most valuable role in these debates is to play both the vanguard and the lightning rod.

The network has also been used by law reform and human rights organisations in more than twenty countries to assist local privacy issues. In Thailand and the Philippines, for example, Privacy International worked with local human rights bodies to develop national campaigns against the establishment of government identity card systems. In Canada, New Zealand, the United States, Hungary, Australia and the United Kingdom we have promoted privacy issues through national media and through public campaigns. In Central and Eastern Europe, PI has been active in promoting government accountability through freedom of information acts. Click here to see some of our campaigns.

Finally, we conduct studies, write reports, and provide expert commentary on contemporary policy and technology issues. We do this work in order to intervene in policy processes, inform debate, and shape decisions. Click here to see a selection of our studies, reports, and commentaries.

PI also has an extensive archive of material on international privacy including major international agreements, country reports, and constitutions. We have archived this information on our website, available here. This is an ever-growing resource to advocates, practictioners, researchers and academics, and students. Click here to see our annual Privacy and Human Rights global survey.

Structure and Finances

Privacy International an independent non-profit organization chartered in the UK. Its U.S. organization is administered through the Fund for Constitutional Government in Washington DC.

Privacy International has received funding and support from a range of Foundations, academic establishments and non-government organisations. These include the Open Society Institute, the Open Society Justice Initiative, the European Parliament, the European Commission framework funding programmes, the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust, the American Civil Liberties Union, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, The Fund for Constitutional Government, the Stern Foundation, the Privacy Foundation, the German Marshall Fund, and the University of New South Wales (Sydney).

Our financial reports and Articles of Incorporation are available through Companies House, UK, under our registration as a non-profit private limited company no. 4354366.

Privacy International is also minimally financed through contributions. (See our Support PI page). Also, our e-mail services are offered to us at a reduced rate by Neomailbox.

For transparency purposes, members of the public may access and review our activity reports, presented to our Annual General Meeting:

Contacting Privacy International
We welcome communications from the public. We are often overwhelmed with emails and telephone calls, but we will do everything we can to respond when we can.

Privacy International
265 Strand
London
WC2R 1BH
United Kingdom

0208.123.7933 (from UK)
+44.208.123.7933 (outside UK)

Email: privacyint@privacy.org

For media, please contact us at

0208.123.7933 (from UK)
+44.208.123.7933 (outside UK)

Email: media@privacy.org